16 minute read

Beauty is the first test: there is no permanent place in this world for ugly mathematics.

—G.H. Hardy

In 2001, Bob Palais wrote the article π is wrong!, remarking on the fact that when π occurs in nature, it occurs as 2π most of the time. He suggests that 2π = 6.283185… should be given a name (τ is now a fan favorite) and that it should be used instead of π. Some found his arguments convincing, including Michael Hartl. In 2010, Hartl published The Tau Manifesto, and the τ movement was born.

Scientific articles and blog posts

Articles against τ:

News articles and blog posts

Click to expand - 2007: - [Bill Gasarch, _Is Pi defined in the best way?_, 2007](https://blog.computationalcomplexity.org/2007/08/is-pi-defined-in-best-way.html) - 2008: - [Robert P. Crease, Physics World, _Constant failure_, 2008](https://physicsworld.com/a/constant-failure/) - 2010: - [_Dozenal tau unit circle_, 2010](https://hexnet.org/content/dozenal-tau-unit-circle) - [MathBlog, _Forget Pi, here comes Tau_, 2010](https://mathblog.com/forget-pi-here-comes-tau/) - 2011: - [Jason Palmer, BBC News, _'Tau day' marked by opponents of maths constant pi_, 2011](https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-13906169) - [Elizabeth Landau, CNN, _On Pi Day, is 'pi' under attack?_, 2011](http://edition.cnn.com/2011/TECH/innovation/03/14/pi.tau.math/index.html) - [Daily Mail, _Your number's up: Why mathematicians are campaigning for pi to be replaced with alternate value tau_, 2011](https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2008963/Why-mathematicians-campaigning-pi-replaced-alternate-value-tau.html) - [Duncan Geere, Wired, _Happy Pi day! Let's kill it_, 2011](https://www.wired.com/story/pi-winning/) - [Natalie Wolchover, Live Science, _Mathematicians Want to Say Goodbye to Pi_, 2011](https://www.livescience.com/14836-pi-wrong-tau.html) - [Drew Grant, Salon, _Pi Day threatened by tau protestors_, 2011](https://www.salon.com/2011/03/14/national_pi_day_viral_videos/) - [Murray Bourne, Interactive Mathematics, _Let’s drop pi_, 2011](https://www.intmath.com/blog/mathematics/lets-drop-pi-5665) - [Debra Black, Toronto Star, _Down with ugly pi, long live elegant Tau, physicist urges_, 2011](https://www.thestar.com/news/world/down-with-ugly-pi-long-live-elegant-tau-physicist-urges/article_e78ae806-7cb6-5ce3-abc8-207053fbdd4d.html) - [The Times of India, _Life of pi over? 'Tau' may set calculations aright_, 2011](https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/science/Life-of-pi-over-Tau-may-set-calculations-aright/articleshow/9034053.cms) - [Alessondra Springmann, PCWorld, _Tau Day: An Even More Fundamental Holiday Than Pi Day_, 2011](https://www.pcworld.com/article/485803/tau_day.html) - [Evann Gastaldo, Newser, _Forget Pi, Here Comes Tau_, 2011](https://www.newser.com/story/122114/forget-pi-here-comes-tau.html) - [Daniel Tovrov, International Business Times, _Happy Tau Day!_, 2011](https://www.ibtimes.com/happy-tau-day-294421) - [Nancy Haught, The Oregonian, _Tau Day today: Mathematicians show their work_, 2011](https://www.oregonlive.com/living/2011/06/post_14.html) - [Nance Haxton, ABC Australia, _Push to roll Pi_, 2011](https://www.abc.net.au/listen/programs/pm/push-to-roll-pi/2775348) - [The McGill Daily, _Pi is wrong_, 2011](https://www.mcgilldaily.com/2011/10/pi-is-wrong/) - [Anqi Shen, phys.org, _Math wars: Debate sparks anti-pi day_, 2011](https://phys.org/news/2011-06-math-wars-debate-anti-pi-day.html) - [The Telegraph Online, _Life of pi in no danger - Experts cold-shoulder campaign to replace with tau_, 2011](https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/life-of-pi-in-no-danger-experts-cold-shoulder-campaign-to-replace-with-tau/cid/380029) - [Simon Wood, Little Storping-in-the-Swuff, _War on Tau_, 2011](https://littlestorping.co.uk/2011/06/28/war-on-tau/) - [Dan Amira, Intelligencer, _Pi Is Very Slowly and Nerdily Going Out of Style_, 2011](https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2011/03/pi_is_very_slowly_and_nerdily.html) - [Sebastian Anthony, Extreme Tech, _Down with pi! Today is Tau Day_, 2011](https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/88298-down-with-pi-today-is-tau-day) - [Jacob Aron, New Scientist, _Pi's nemesis: Mathematics is better with tau_, 2011](https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20927944-300-pis-nemesis-mathematics-is-better-with-tau/) (Interview with M. Hartl, subscription required) - [Alasdair Wilkins, _Why we have to get rid of pi for the sake of good math_, 2011](https://gizmodo.com/why-we-have-to-get-rid-of-pi-for-the-sake-of-good-math-5750275) (interview with M. Hartl) - [Eric Raymond, _Tau versus Pi_, 2011](http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=3481) - [Qiaochu Yuan, _Pi is still wrong_, 2011](https://qchu.wordpress.com/2011/03/14/pi-is-still-wrong/) - [Ulrich Pontes, Der Spiegel, _Physiker will Pi abschaffen_, 2011](https://www.spiegel.de/wissenschaft/mensch/revolution-gegen-die-kreiszahl-physiker-will-pi-abschaffen-a-771007.html) - 2012: - [Jonathan Chang, Science Line, _The tyranny of π_, 2012](https://scienceline.org/2012/06/the-tyranny-of-%CF%80-2/) - [Kevin Houston, _Why I'm not celebrating tau day_, 2012](https://www.kevinhouston.net/blog/2012/06/why-im-not-celebrating-tau-day/) - 2013: - [Ethan Brown, _Pi vs Tau: Pi's Rebuttal_, 2013](https://coolmathstuff123.blogspot.com/2013/02/pi-vs-tau-pis-rebuttal_9.html) - [Rachel, Plus Magazine, _Happy Tau Day!!_, 2013](https://plus.maths.org/content/happy-tau-day) - [Dmitry Brant, _Pi is wrong! Long live Tau!_, 2013](https://dmitrybrant.com/2011/10/16/pi-is-wrong-long-live-tau) - [PBS, _Geeking Out on Pi Day: For the Love of Pi and the Tao of Tau_, 2013](https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/for-the-love-of-pi-and-the-tao-of-tau) - 2014: - [Randyn Charles Bartholomew, Scientific American, _Let's Use Tau--It's Easier Than Pi_, 2014](https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/let-s-use-tau-it-s-easier-than-pi/) - [Jolie Lee, _Happy Pi Day! Unless you are a Tauist_, 2014](https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2014/03/14/pi-day-tau-math/6410959/) - [_Pi VERSUS Tau?!?_, 2014](https://headinside.blogspot.com/2014/06/pi-versus-tau.html) - 2015: - [Giorgia Fortuna, Wolfram, _2 Pi or Not 2 Pi?_, 2015](https://blog.wolfram.com/2015/06/28/2-pi-or-not-2-pi/) - [Fox News, _On National Tau Day, Pi Under Attack_, 2015](https://www.foxnews.com/science/on-national-tau-day-pi-under-attack) - [Kury Cagle, _The Tao of Tau_, 2015](https://medium.com/metaphorical-web/the-tao-of-tau-c0a703283075) - 2016: - [Greg Uyeno, Science Line, _The Circle Constant, Or what's the matter with π_, 2016](https://scienceline.org/2016/06/the-circle-constant/) - [Tia Ghose, Live Science, _Tau Day: Should Pi Be Downgraded?_, 2016](https://www.livescience.com/55209-tau-is-better-than-pi.html) - [Nsikan Akpan, _3 reasons Pi Day is a sham_, 2016](https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/3-reasons-pi-day-is-a-sham) - 2017: - [Elizabeth Landau, Scientific American, _The Tao of Tau_, 2017](https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/the-tao-of-tau/) - [_Pi vs Tau – The Great Debate_, 2017](https://maffsisphun.wordpress.com/2017/12/09/pi-vs-tau-the-great-debate/) - 2018: - [Chaim Gartenberg, The Verge, _Tau Day is here: celebrate tau, not pi, as the true circle constant_, 2018](https://www.theverge.com/tldr/2018/3/14/17119388/pi-day-pie-math-tau-circle-constant-mathematics-circumference-diameter-radius-holiday-truth) - [Emily Conover, Science News, _Forget Pi Day. We should be celebrating Tau Day_, 2018](https://www.sciencenews.org/blog/science-the-public/forget-pi-day-we-should-be-celebrating-tau-day) - 2020: - [Robert McMillan, The Wall Street Journal, _For Math Fans, Nothing Can Spoil Pi Day—Except Maybe Tau Day_, 2020](https://www.wsj.com/articles/for-math-fans-nothing-can-spoil-pi-dayexcept-maybe-tau-day-11584123031) - [Abinash Das, cosmisconundrum, _Tau vs Pi: The Quest to Become the Ultimate Constant._, 2020](https://cosmicconundrum.org/the-struggle-for-being-the-ultimate-constant-tau-vs-pi/) - 2021: - [Paolo A., _in honor of tau_, 2021](https://mitadmissions.org/blogs/entry/in-honor-of-tau/) - [Susanne M. Hoffmann, _Wer pi nicht mag, kann heute tau feiern_, 2021](https://scilogs.spektrum.de/uhura-uraniae/wer-pi-nicht-mag-kann-heute-tau-feiern/) - 2022: - [Andrea Zhao, The Varsity, _Tau versus pi: the unresolved battle_, 2022](https://thevarsity.ca/2022/06/28/tau-day-two-pi-mathematics/) - [Mary Bilyeu, _Double both pi and pie on Tau Day_, 2022](https://www.toledoblade.com/a-e/food/2022/06/26/june-28-tau-pie-day/stories/20220626002) - 2023: - [Live Science, _12 numbers that are cooler than pi_, 2023](https://www.livescience.com/64987-numbers-as-cool-as-pi.html) - [Mathnasium, _Tau: A better constant than Pi?_, 2023](https://www.mathnasium.com/blog/tau-constant-better-pi) - [Andrew Griffin, _Pi Day: Why some mathematicians refuse to celebrate 14 March and won't observe it_, 2023](https://www.aol.com/news/pi-day-why-mathematicians-refuse-150701047.html)

Videos

Textbooks

In pop culture

Historical uses

Al-Kashi (1424)

(All quotes are translated from the German translation by P. Luckey, 1950.)

While Archimedes was able to bound the ratio of a circle circumference and diameter between 223/71 (≈ 3.1408) and 22/7 (≈ 3.1428), Jamshid al-Kashi wanted to determine it to a much higher precision. In his 1424 Treatise on the circumference of the circle, it was his goal

to determine the circumference of the circle in the parts where the diameter is known, to the extent that we are certain that in a circle whose diameter is six hundred thousand times the diameter of the Earth, the difference between it (the determined circumference) and the true circumference does not amount to a single hair that is one-sixth the width of an average barleycorn, so that this (difference) in a circle smaller than that is negligible.

This translates to approximately 14 decimal digits.

His calculations are performed in sexagesimal (base 60) digits. In section 8, Transformation of the value of the circumference into the Indian digits under the condition that half of the diameter be one, he gives the result in decimal digits:

We have arranged these figures from left to right into a half-verse to form a verse:

wa baḥǧā ḥahǧi ṣaz a za ṭah ḥawahu

muḥīṭun li-quṭrin huwa ’ṯnāni minhu

6 2 8 3 1 8 5 3 0 7 1 7 9 5 8 6 5

is [the] circumference to a diameter, which is twice that.

Further reading:

π in the times of Euler

The section Adoption of the symbol π of the excellent Wikipedia article Pi says:

In the earliest usages, the Greek letter π was used to denote the semiperimeter (semiperipheria in Latin) of a circle and was combined in ratios with δ (for diameter or semidiameter) or ρ (for radius) to form circle constants. (Before then, mathematicians sometimes used letters such as c or p instead.) The first recorded use is Oughtred’s “δ.π”, to express the ratio of periphery and diameter in the 1647 and later editions of Clavis Mathematicae. Barrow likewise used “πδ” to represent the constant 3.14…, while Gregory instead used “$\frac{\pi}{\rho}$” to represent 6.28…

The earliest known use of the Greek letter π alone to represent the ratio of a circle’s circumference to its diameter was by Welsh mathematician William Jones in his 1706 work Synopsis Palmariorum Matheseos; or, a New Introduction to the Mathematics. The Greek letter first appears there in the phrase “1/2 Periphery (π)” in the discussion of a circle with radius one. However, he writes that his equations for π are from the “ready pen of the truly ingenious Mr. John Machin”, leading to speculation that Machin may have employed the Greek letter before Jones. Jones’ notation was not immediately adopted by other mathematicians, with the fraction notation still being used as late as 1767.

Euler started using the single-letter form beginning with his 1727 Essay Explaining the Properties of Air, though he used π = 6.28…, the ratio of periphery to radius, in this and some later writing. Euler first used π = 3.14… in his 1736 work Mechanica, and continued in his widely-read 1748 work Introductio in analysin infinitorum (he wrote: “for the sake of brevity we will write this number as π; thus π is equal to half the circumference of a circle of radius 1”). Because Euler corresponded heavily with other mathematicians in Europe, the use of the Greek letter spread rapidly, and the practice was universally adopted thereafter in the Western world, though the definition still varied between 3.14… and 6.28… as late as 1761.


In programming

Accepted Rejected
Processing, since 2.0 (2013) TAU Dart (2011)
Raku (aka Perl 6), since 2015 tau Julia (2013)
Nim, since 0.14.0 (2016) TAU JavaScript (2014)
Python, since 3.6 (2016) math.tau Ruby (2016)
Unreal Engine, since 4.12 (2016) TAU NumPy (2017)
CSS (2018) turn Go (2020)
OpenFOAM twoPi Swift (2020)
Extreme Numerics.NET Constants.TwoPi Kotlin (2020)
V, since 0.1.7 (2019) tau Luau (2022)
Zig, since 0.6.0 (2019) tau C++ (2022)
Manim, since 0.1.0 (2020) TAU  
Rust, since 1.47 (2020) std::f64::consts::TAU  
.NET, C#, since 5.0 (2020) Tau  
Boost, since 1.77.0 (2021) tau  
Godot game engine/GDScript, since 3.3.3 (2021) TAU  
Crystal, since 0.36.0 (2021) Math::TAU  
Java, OpenJDK, since 19 (2022) Math.TAU  
JSCAD, since 2.6.3 (2022) TAU  
Liberty Eiffel, upcoming (202x) Tau  

Some equations

Trigonometry

\[\begin{split} \sin(\alpha) &= \sin(\alpha + \textcolor{orange}{\tau}) \quad\forall \alpha\\ \cos(\alpha) &= \cos(\alpha + \textcolor{orange}{\tau}) \quad\forall \alpha\\ \tan(\alpha) &= \tan(\alpha + \textcolor{orange}{\tau}) \quad\forall \alpha \end{split}\]

With τ being a full revolution, the following identities are very easy to grasp (for integers n). Remember the sine is the projection of the angle onto the y-axis, the cosine is the projection onto the x-axis.

\[\begin{alignat*}{3} \sin(n \textcolor{orange}{\tau}) &= 0, &\qquad \cos(n \textcolor{orange}{\tau}) &= 1,\\ \sin((n + 1/4) \textcolor{orange}{\tau}) &= 1, &\qquad \cos((n + 1/4) \textcolor{orange}{\tau}) &= 0,\\ \sin((n + 1/2) \textcolor{orange}{\tau}) &= 0, &\qquad \cos((n + 1/2) \textcolor{orange}{\tau}) &= -1,\\ \sin((n + 3/4) \textcolor{orange}{\tau}) &= -1, &\qquad \cos((n + 3/4) \textcolor{orange}{\tau}) &= 0 \end{alignat*}\]

Trigonometric values off the grid can easily be estimated:

  • sin(27.4 π) – Where is my calculator?
  • sin(13.7 τ) – 13 full revolutions: forget about those. Plus .7, that’s almost 3/4 of a revolution, so probably something close to −1. (Actual value: −0.95105651629…)


Surface area of the n-dimensional unit sphere

\[|U_n| = \frac{2\textcolor{teal}{\pi}^{n/2}}{\Gamma(n/2)} = \begin{cases} 2 & \text{if } n = 1\\ \textcolor{orange}{\tau} & \text{if } n = 2\\ |U_{n-2}| \times \textcolor{orange}{\tau} / (n - 2) & \text{otherwise} \end{cases}\]

n-dimensional Gegenbauer integral over the unit ball Sn

\[|G_n^{\lambda}| = \int_{S^n} \left(1 - \sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2\right)^\lambda = \begin{cases} 1&\text{for $n=0$}\\ B\left(\lambda + 1, \frac{1}{2}\right)&\text{for $n=1$}\\ |G_{n-2}^{\lambda}|\times \textcolor{orange}{\tau} / (2\lambda + n) & \text{otherwise} \end{cases}\]

with the Beta function B.

Special cases:

  • Volume of the n-dimensional unit ball (λ = 0):

    \[|S_n| = \begin{cases} 1 & \text{if } n = 0\\ 2 & \text{if } n = 1\\ |S_{n-2}| \times \textcolor{orange}{\tau} / n & \text{otherwise} \end{cases}\]

  • The area of a disk (λ = 0, n = 2)

    \[|S_n(r)| = \frac{\textcolor{orange}{\tau}}{2} r^2 = \textcolor{teal}{\pi} r^2\]

  • n = 1, λ = −1/2

    \[\int_{-1}^1 \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-x^2}} = \textcolor{teal}{\pi}\]


  • n = 1, λ = 1/2

    \[\int_{-1}^1 \sqrt{1-x^2} = \frac{\textcolor{teal}{\pi}}{2}\]


n-dimensional generalized Cauchy volume (2λ > n)

As appearing in its one-dimensional version in the Cauchy distribution and Student’s t distribution.

\[\begin{align*} |Y_n^{\lambda}| &= \int_{\mathbb{R}^n} \left(1 + \sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2\right)^{-\lambda}\\ &= \begin{cases} 1&\text{for $n=0$}\\ B\left(\lambda - \frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{2}\right)&\text{for $n=1$}\\ |Y_{n-2}^{\lambda}|\times \textcolor{orange}{\tau} / (2\lambda - n) & \text{otherwise} \end{cases} \end{align*}\]

Note again that the Beta function B, with one argument ½, includes a factor $\sqrt{\pi}$. Specifically, for n = 1 and λ = 1,

\[|Y_1^1| = B(\tfrac{1}{2}, \tfrac{1}{2}) = \textcolor{teal}{\pi}.\]


n-dimensional generalized Laguerre volume

\[\begin{align*} V_n &= \int_{\mathbb{R}^n} \left(\sqrt{x_1^2+\cdots+x_n^2}\right)^\alpha \exp\left(-\sqrt{x_1^2+\dots+x_n^2}\right)\\ &= \begin{cases} 2\Gamma(1+\alpha)&\text{if $n=1$}\\ \textcolor{orange}{\tau}\Gamma(2 + \alpha)&\text{if $n=2$}\\ V_{n-2} \times \textcolor{orange}{\tau} (n+\alpha-1) (n+\alpha-2) / (n-2) & \text{otherwise} \end{cases} \end{align*}\]


The normal distribution and the Gaussian integral

\[\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \exp(-x^2)\,dx = \sqrt{\textcolor{teal}{\pi}},\qquad \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \exp(-x^2 / 2)\,dx = \sqrt{\textcolor{orange}{\tau}}\]

One could argue that the latter is more “canonical” since it has variance and standard deviation of 1, not $1/2$ and $\sqrt{1/2}$. The normal distribution does feature the factor $1/2$:

\[\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{1}{\sigma \sqrt{\textcolor{orange}{\tau}}} \exp\left(-\frac{(x-\mu)^2}{2 \sigma^2}\right) \,dx= 1\]


Error function

\[\mathrm{erf}(z) = \frac{2}{\sqrt{\textcolor{teal}{\pi}}} \int_0^z \exp(-t^2)\, dt.\]

In statistics, for non-negative values of x, the error function has the following interpretation: For a random variable Y that is normally distributed with mean 0 and standard deviation $1/\sqrt{2}$, erf(x) is the probability that Y falls in the range [−x, x]. The same property with standard deviation 1 is fulfilled by

\[\mathrm{erf}_1(z) = \mathrm{erf}(z / \sqrt{2}) = \frac{2}{\sqrt{\textcolor{orange}{\tau}}} \int_0^z \exp(-t^2 / 2)\, dt.\]


Cauchy’s integral formula

Let $U$ be an open subset of the complex plane $\mathbb{C}$, and suppose the closed disk $D$ defined as

\[D = \bigl\{z:|z-z_{0}|\leq r\bigr\}\]

is completely contained in $U$. Let $f:U\to\mathbb{C}$ be a holomorphic function, and let $\gamma$ be the circle, oriented counterclockwise, forming the boundary of $D$. Then for every $a$ in the interior of $D$,

\[f(a) = \frac{1}{\textcolor{orange}{\tau} i} \oint_{\gamma}\frac{f(z)}{z-a} dz.\]

Cauchy’s residue theorem

Let $U$ be a simply connected open subset of the complex plane containing a finite list of points $a_1,\dots,a_n$, $U_0 = U \setminus {a_1,\dots,a_n}$, and a function $f$ defined and holomorphic on $U_0$. Let γ be a closed rectifiable curve in $U_0$, and denote the winding number of $\gamma$ around $a_k$ by $I(\gamma, a_k)$. The line integral of $f$ around $\gamma$ is equal to $\textcolor{orange}{\tau} i$ times the sum of residues of $f$ at the points, each counted as many times as $\gamma$ winds around the point:

\[\oint_\gamma f(z)\,\mathrm{d}z = \textcolor{orange}{\tau} i \sum_{k=1}^n I(\gamma,a_k) \mathrm{Res}(f,a_k)\]

Fourier transform

\[\begin{align*} \hat{f}(\xi) &= \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f(x) \exp(-i\textcolor{orange}{\tau} x\xi)\,dx,\\ f(x) &= \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \hat{f}(\xi) \exp(i\textcolor{orange}{\tau} x\xi)\,d\xi \end{align*}\]

nth roots of unity

\[z^n = 1 \quad\Rightarrow\quad z = \exp(i\textcolor{orange}{\tau} k / n) \quad\forall k=0,\dots,n-1\]

Euler’s identity

\[\exp(i \textcolor{teal}{\pi}) + 1 = 0,\quad \exp(i \textcolor{orange}{\tau}) - 1 = 0\]

Stirling’s approximation

\[n! \sim \sqrt{\textcolor{orange}{\tau} n} \left(\frac{n}{e}\right)^n\]


Particular values of the Gamma function

  • Positive half-integers:

    Γ(½) = √π, so all half-integer values of Γ contain that factor (recall Γ(z+1) = z Γ(z)):

    \[\Gamma(n + \tfrac{1}{2}) = \sqrt{\textcolor{teal}{\pi}} \prod_{i=0}^{n-1} \left(i + \frac{1}{2}\right)\]

    for n ∈ ℕ. Equivalently:

    \[\Gamma(n + \tfrac{1}{2}) = \sqrt{\textcolor{teal}{\pi}} \frac{(2n-1)!!}{2^n}\]

    or (for odd n > 0)

    \[\Gamma(\tfrac{n}{2}) = \sqrt{\textcolor{teal}{\pi}} \frac{(n-2)!!}{2^{(n-1)/2}}.\]

  • The multiplication theorem:

    \[\prod_{k=0}^{m-1}\Gamma\left(z+\frac{k}{m}\right) = \textcolor{orange}{\tau}^\frac{m-1}{2} m^{\frac{1}{2}-mz} \Gamma(mz),\]

    and its special case (m = 2), the Legendre duplication formula

    \[\Gamma(z)\Gamma(z+\tfrac{1}{2}) = 2^{1-2z}\sqrt{\textcolor{teal}{\pi}}\Gamma(2z).\]

  • Euler’s reflection formula:

    \[\Gamma(z)\Gamma(1-z) = \frac{\textcolor{teal}{\pi}}{\sin(\textcolor{teal}{\pi} z)}\]


Riemann zeta function

Values at even integers:

\[\zeta(2n) = \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{k^{2n}} = (-1)^{n+1} \frac{\textcolor{orange}{\tau}^{2n} B_{2n}}{2 (2n)!},\]

for $n\in\mathbb{N}$, e.g.,

\[\zeta(2) = \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{k^2} = \frac{\textcolor{teal}{\pi}^2}{6} = \frac{\textcolor{orange}{\tau}^2}{24}\]

A reflection formula:

\[\frac{\zeta(1-z)}{\zeta(z)} = 2 \frac{\Gamma(z)}{\textcolor{orange}{\tau}^z} \cos\left(\frac{\textcolor{orange}{\tau} z}{4}\right)\]

Weyl law

\[\lim_{\lambda\to\infty} \frac{N(\lambda)}{\lambda^{d/2}} = \textcolor{orange}{\tau}^{-d}\omega_d \mathrm{vol}(\Omega)\]

The sinc function and its power integrals

\[\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{\sin^n(x)}{x^n}\,dx = \frac{n \textcolor{orange}{\tau}}{2^n}\sum_{k=0}^{\lfloor n/2 \rfloor} \frac{(-1)^k (n-2k)^{n-1}}{k!(n-k)!}\]

for all $n\in\mathbb{N}$. Specifically,

\[\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{\sin(x)}{x}\,dx = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{\sin^2(x)}{x^2}\,dx = \frac{\textcolor{orange}{\tau}}{2} = \textcolor{teal}{\pi}.\]


The Borwein integral

\[\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \prod_{k=0}^n \frac{\sin(a_k x)}{a_k x}\,dx = \textcolor{teal}{\pi} C_n\]

with some rational $C_n$ (see here).


Physics

  • Cosmological constant:

    \[\Lambda = \frac{4\textcolor{orange}{\tau} G}{3c^2} \rho\]

  • Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle:

    \[\Delta x \Delta p \ge \frac{h}{2 \textcolor{orange}{\tau}}\]

  • Einstein’s field equation of general relativity:

    \[R_{\mu\nu} = \frac{4\textcolor{orange}{\tau} G}{c^4} T_{\mu\nu}\]

  • Coulomb’s law for the electric force in vacuum:

    \[F = \frac{|q_1 q_2|}{2\textcolor{orange}{\tau} \varepsilon_0 r^2}\]

  • Magnetic permeability of free space:

    \[\mu_0 \approx 2\textcolor{orange}{\tau} \times 10^{-7} N/A^2\]

  • Approximate period of a simple pendulum with small amplitude:

    \[T \approx \textcolor{orange}{\tau} \sqrt{\frac{L}{g}}\]

  • Exact period of a simple pendulum with amplitude θ0:

    \[T = \frac{\textcolor{orange}{\tau}}{\mathrm{agm}(1, \cos(\theta_0/2))} \sqrt{\frac{L}{g}}\]

    (agm is the arithmetic-geometric mean.)

  • Kepler’s third law of planetary motion:

    \[\frac{R^3}{T^2} = \frac{GM}{\textcolor{orange}{\tau}^2}\]

  • The buckling formula:

    \[F = \frac{\textcolor{orange}{\tau}^2 EI}{4L^2}\]

  • Reduced Planck constant:

    \[\hbar = \frac{h}{\textcolor{orange}{\tau}}\]

  • Reactance of an inductor:

    \[\textcolor{orange}{\tau} fL\]

  • Susceptance of a capacitor:

    \[\textcolor{orange}{\tau} fC\]

Quotes

  • Terence Tao (2007, here):

    It may be that 2πi is an even more fundamental constant than 2π or π. It is, after all, the generator of log(1). The fact that so many formulae involving πn depend on the parity of n is another clue in this regard.


  • John Conway (2008, from Constant Failure by Robert P Crease):

    […] I posed this question to the Princeton University mathematician John Conway, one of the most creative mathematicians working today. Conway, it turned out, had strong feelings on the subject. “2π is obviously the correct constant!” he told me immediately — although he also told me of arguments, which he did not find persuasive, for a third option, π/2. […]


  • Arthur Benjamin (2013, Twitter Q&A):

    I’m a big tau lover. I agree with the statement that if we could go back in time and change the factor to tau we would have simplified our theorems and formulas. Obviously, it will be very hard to change people’s perceptions in order to use tau, but maybe in mathematics there is enough of a will to do such a thing. I’ve seen books now that proudly claim “tau certified”.


  • John Baez (2022, from 12 numbers that are cooler than pi):

    Using τ makes every formula clearer and more logical than using π. Our focus on π rather than 2π is a historical accident.


This blog post is updated once in a while.

Updated:

You May Also Enjoy

The State of Math in Markdown

5 minute read

TLDR: Markdown + math is hard. GitHub is bad, Gitea better, GitLab best. Backticked syntax trumps $-syntax.

Math on GitHub: Following up

4 minute read

About six weeks ago, on May 19, 2022, GitHub released Math support on Markdown. At the time of the release, it received criticism for being ill-designed and ...

Math on GitHub: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly

7 minute read

Finally! On May 19, 2022, GitHub released one of its most requested features: Math support on Markdown! Many had been anticipating this for years, including ...